An Audit of Assumptions
Transforming digital tax filing experiences by aligning design with real user roles and workflows

Overview
When Research Rewrites the Roadmap
The organization was undertaking a large-scale digital transformation to migrate a high-volume, paper-based tax filing process online. Initial product strategy and delivery plans prioritized features for corporate accountants based on internal assumptions about primary users.
Despite previous investments, the system continued to generate high error rates, support calls, and operational backlog—signaling that the problem was not purely technical or UI-driven.
Role
Lead Service & Interaction Designer, Lead Researcher
Delivery Team
39 cross-functional partners across Product, Engineering, Design, Ops
Timeline
12 months
Impact
Research-Driven Results
The redesigned service demonstrated how aligning user roles, system logic, and operational workflows can unlock measurable gains across adoption and efficiency.
Increased Submissions
+61%
Generated Revenue
+$3M
Cases Processed
+10M
Reduced Phone Inquiries
-31%
Problem
A System Built on Assumptions
The core risk was misaligned problem definition.
Product roadmaps assumed corporate accountants were the primary filers
Research on CPAs—the professionals responsible for accuracy and submission—was limited
Translating paper processes directly into digital forms obscured role boundaries, handoffs, and validation needs
Building for the wrong user first risked scaling inefficiency and rework
The challenge was to validate user assumptions without significantly disrupting delivery timelines.

My Role
Bridging Research, Delivery, and Policy
As Lead Service & Interaction Designer and Lead Researcher, I was responsible for clarifying the real problem, aligning stakeholders around evidence, and translating insights into scalable system design.
Led qualitative research across CPAs, associates, and corporate accountants
Synthesized findings into journeys and service-level insights
Used research to influence product strategy and sequencing decisions
Partnered closely with product, engineering, operations, and legal
Product
Translating requirements and insights into prioritized, shippable work
Engineering
Estimating effort and designing within system and delivery constraints
Operations
Validating designs against real processing workflows and call drivers
Legal
Ensuring compliant experiences without introducing user friction
Research Insights
Letting Evidence Lead
Each round of research surfaced new actors, dependencies, and handoffs, progressively reframing the problem from a single-user flow to a coordinated service.
Research Round 1

Corporate Accountants
Large OrganizationsAssumption
Corporate accountants file independently and collaborate only internally
Key Insight
Corporate accountants typically file with CPAs, not on their own
System Shift →
Reframed primary user from Corporate Accountant to CPA
Research Round 2

CPAs
(Certified Public Accountants)Assumption
CPAs are heavily involved in form completion
Key Insight
CPAs primarily review, validate, and sign off—they do not perform most data entry
System Shift →
Filing is review-led, not form-led
Research Round 3

CPA Assistants
(Certified Public Accountants)Assumption
Preparation work is evenly distributed
Key Insight
Assistants handle most data entry and manage filings for multiple corporate clients
System Shift →
Introduced execution-layer roles with task-based needs
Research Round 4

Accountants
Small / Midsize Organizations
Assumption
Filing without CPAs is structurally different
Key Insight
Accountants mirror CPA assistant workflows; review authority remains centralized
System Shift →
Same role pattern applies across org sizes
Research Round 5

Accounting Clerk
Small / Midsize OrganizationsAssumption
Clerks have limited complexity
Key Insight
Clerks manage multiple filings and depend on clear validation and handoffs
System Shift →
Confirmed consistent “prepare, review, submit” model
Design Strategy
Designing the Filing Service, Not the Form
I approached this work as a service redesign, using a discovery-to-delivery framework to align user needs, system constraints, and compliance requirements across roles.
Discover
Mapped end-to-end journeys to uncover role ownership, handoffs, and risk concentration
Define
Reframed the problem from supporting corporate filers to enabling CPA-led service delivery
Design
Created distinct yet connected workflows for CPAs, associates, and corporate accountants
Deliver
Realigned the development roadmap through cross-functional and legal collaboration
Result
Research That Paid Off
By designing the filing experience as a multi-actor, coordinated service, the system enabled more accurate submissions, reduced support burden, and scaled across individual practitioners and enterprise teams.
The work also contributed to the client receiving a Service to the Citizen Award for Delivering Excellence in Digital Services, recognizing the impact of the digital transformation.

An Audit of Assumptions
Transforming digital tax filing experiences by aligning design with real user roles and workflows


Overview
When Research Rewrites the Roadmap
The organization was undertaking a large-scale digital transformation to migrate a high-volume, paper-based tax filing process online. Initial product strategy and delivery plans prioritized features for corporate accountants based on internal assumptions about primary users.
Despite previous investments, the system continued to generate high error rates, support calls, and operational backlog—signaling that the problem was not purely technical or UI-driven.
Role
Lead Service & Interaction Designer, Lead Researcher
Delivery Team
39 cross-functional partners across Product, Engineering, Design, Ops
Timeline
12 months
Impact
Research-Driven Results
The redesigned service demonstrated how aligning user roles, system logic, and operational workflows can unlock measurable gains across adoption and efficiency.
Increased Submissions
+61%
Generated Revenue
+$3M
Cases Processed
+10M
Reduced Phone Inquiries
-31%


Problem
A System Built on Assumptions
The core risk was misaligned problem definition.
Product roadmaps assumed corporate accountants were the primary filers
Research on CPAs—the professionals responsible for accuracy and submission—was limited
Translating paper processes directly into digital forms obscured role boundaries, handoffs, and validation needs
Building for the wrong user first risked scaling inefficiency and rework
The challenge was to validate user assumptions without significantly disrupting delivery timelines.
My Role
Bridging Research, Delivery, and Policy
As Lead Service & Interaction Designer and Lead Researcher, I was responsible for clarifying the real problem, aligning stakeholders around evidence, and translating insights into scalable system design.
Led qualitative research across CPAs, associates, and corporate accountants
Synthesized findings into journeys and service-level insights
Used research to influence product strategy and sequencing decisions
Partnered closely with product, engineering, operations, and legal
Product
Translating requirements and insights into prioritized, shippable work
Engineering
Estimating effort and designing within system and delivery constraints
Operations
Validating designs against real processing workflows and call drivers
Legal
Ensuring compliant experiences without introducing user friction
Research Round 1

Corporate Accountants
Large OrganizationsAssumption
Corporate accountants file independently and collaborate only internally
Key Insight
Corporate accountants typically file with CPAs, not on their own
System Shift →
Reframed primary user from corporate accountant to CPA
Research Round 2

CPAs
(Certified Public Accountants)Assumption
CPAs are heavily involved in form completion
Key Insight
CPAs primarily review, validate, and sign off—they do not perform most data entry
System Shift →
Filing is review-led, not form-led
Research Round 3

CPA Assistants
(Certified Public Accountants)Assumption
Preparation work is evenly distributed
Key Insight
Assistants handle most data entry and manage filings for multiple corporate clients
System Shift →
Introduced execution-layer roles with task-based needs
Research Round 4

Accountants
Small / Midsize Organizations
Assumption
Filing without CPAs is structurally different
Key Insight
Accountants mirror CPA assistant workflows; review authority remains centralized
System Shift →
Same role pattern applies across org sizes
Research Round 5

Accounting Clerk
Small / Midsize OrganizationsAssumption
Clerks have limited complexity
Key Insight
Clerks manage multiple filings and depend on clear validation and handoffs
System Shift →
Confirmed consistent “prepare, review, submit” model
Research Insights
Letting Evidence Lead
Each round of research surfaced new actors, dependencies, and handoffs, progressively reframing the problem from a single-user flow to a coordinated service.
Design Strategy
Designing the Filing Service, Not the Form
I approached this work as a service redesign, using a discovery-to-delivery framework to align user needs, system constraints, and compliance requirements across roles.
Discover
Mapped end-to-end journeys to uncover role ownership, handoffs, and risk concentration
Define
Reframed the problem from supporting corporate filers to enabling CPA-led service delivery
Design
Created distinct yet connected workflows for CPAs, associates, and corporate accountants
Deliver
Realigned the development roadmap through cross-functional and legal collaboration
Result
Research That Paid Off
By designing the filing experience as a multi-actor, coordinated service, the system enabled more accurate submissions, reduced support burden, and scaled across individual practitioners and enterprise teams.
The work also contributed to the client receiving a Service to the Citizen Award for Delivering Excellence in Digital Services, recognizing the impact of the digital transformation.


